Uded as negative controls, which were showed in Table S3. “No.” represents the number of each plasma sample. (b) The correlation analyses between eight analytic antigens based on antibody responses. The correlations with correlation coefficient (R) more than 0.6 and p-value less than 0.05 are shown. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060825.gResults Purification and characterization of recombinant Tat proteinWe designed a set of recombinant antigens carrying different functional domains: Tat(1?8), Tat(1?6), Tat(22?00), Tat(38?100), Tat(38?1), Tat(41?1C) and sTat1-21 (Fig. 1a). These proteins were expressed in E. coli and then purified. Purified Tat proteins were relatively pure and largely free of contaminating bacterial protein, as assessed by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis (Fig. 1b).gp41, and most of these exhibited either strong or moderate binding reactivity (Fig. 2a).Characterization of antibody responses to antigens containing various Tat functional domainsIn this study, we wished to characterize the anti-Tat responses against different Tat domains using the tailor-made recombinant peptides Tat(1?8), Tat(1?6), Tat(22?00), Tat(38?00), Tat(38?61), Tat(41?1C) and sTat1-21. All of the analytic antigens showed specific binding reactivity to portions of the Tatseropositive samples with percentages ranging from 13.3?9.5 (Fig. 2b). The positive reactions of each antigen were similar in pattern: i.e., a very small fraction exhibited strong binding 1655472 reactivity (OD values above 1.0), a small fraction exhibited moderate binding reactivity (OD values between 0.3?.0) and most exhibited weak binding reactivity (OD values between 0.2?0.3), which suggests a nondominant nature for these antigens (Fig. 
3a). Interestingly, the N-terminal antigen Tat(1?1) or the Nterminus-containing antigens Tat(1?6) and Tat(1?8)–referred to as “N antigens”–showed obviously different reaction patterns compared with antigens lacking the N-terminus–referred to as “C antigens” (Fig. 2b, 3a). The antigenicity of the N antigens showed an obvious gradient: Tat(1?1), Tat(1?6) and Tat(1?8) showed weak, moderate and strong antigenicities, respectively,Anti-Tat antibodies in Chinese individuals infected with HIV-We collected 326 HIV-1-infected samples from a clinical cohort of Youan hospital in Beijing, China. Plasma samples from 100 healthy blood donors were included as controls. We established Hexaconazole web full-length, recombinant, subtype B Tat protein based ELISA assay to screen out Tat-seropositive samples. This assay is able to detect all of the antibody isotypes using HRP-LD5 as conjuate [23,24]. Out of 326 samples ASP015K tested, only 42 (12.9 ) were positive for anti-Tat antibodies, and most of these (31/42 or 73.8 ) showed only weak reactivity (Fig. 2a, 3a). No anti-Tat positive samples were detected in the blood-donor sample. In contrast, gp41 showed strong antigenicity: all 326 samples reacted withFigure 4. Comparison of Tat-neutralizing potential of plasma samples. (a) Antibody-mediated neutralization of exogenous recombinant fulllength Tat. The percent inhibition of transactivation at 48 h was plotted on the y-axis with the following samples on the x-axis: HIV+Tat+, HIV-1seropositive and anti-Tat-seropositive plasma; HIV+Tat-, HIV-1-seropositive and anti-Tat-seronegative plasma; and HIV-, healthy blood-donor plasma. The data on the y-axis represent the inhibition of the SEAP release in the culture supernatant of HEK293T cells, as described in the “Materials and Methods” section. The boxes.Uded as negative controls, which were showed in Table S3. “No.” represents the number of each plasma sample. (b) The correlation analyses between eight analytic antigens based on antibody responses. The 
correlations with correlation coefficient (R) more than 0.6 and p-value less than 0.05 are shown. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060825.gResults Purification and characterization of recombinant Tat proteinWe designed a set of recombinant antigens carrying different functional domains: Tat(1?8), Tat(1?6), Tat(22?00), Tat(38?100), Tat(38?1), Tat(41?1C) and sTat1-21 (Fig. 1a). These proteins were expressed in E. coli and then purified. Purified Tat proteins were relatively pure and largely free of contaminating bacterial protein, as assessed by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis (Fig. 1b).gp41, and most of these exhibited either strong or moderate binding reactivity (Fig. 2a).Characterization of antibody responses to antigens containing various Tat functional domainsIn this study, we wished to characterize the anti-Tat responses against different Tat domains using the tailor-made recombinant peptides Tat(1?8), Tat(1?6), Tat(22?00), Tat(38?00), Tat(38?61), Tat(41?1C) and sTat1-21. All of the analytic antigens showed specific binding reactivity to portions of the Tatseropositive samples with percentages ranging from 13.3?9.5 (Fig. 2b). The positive reactions of each antigen were similar in pattern: i.e., a very small fraction exhibited strong binding 1655472 reactivity (OD values above 1.0), a small fraction exhibited moderate binding reactivity (OD values between 0.3?.0) and most exhibited weak binding reactivity (OD values between 0.2?0.3), which suggests a nondominant nature for these antigens (Fig. 3a). Interestingly, the N-terminal antigen Tat(1?1) or the Nterminus-containing antigens Tat(1?6) and Tat(1?8)–referred to as “N antigens”–showed obviously different reaction patterns compared with antigens lacking the N-terminus–referred to as “C antigens” (Fig. 2b, 3a). The antigenicity of the N antigens showed an obvious gradient: Tat(1?1), Tat(1?6) and Tat(1?8) showed weak, moderate and strong antigenicities, respectively,Anti-Tat antibodies in Chinese individuals infected with HIV-We collected 326 HIV-1-infected samples from a clinical cohort of Youan hospital in Beijing, China. Plasma samples from 100 healthy blood donors were included as controls. We established full-length, recombinant, subtype B Tat protein based ELISA assay to screen out Tat-seropositive samples. This assay is able to detect all of the antibody isotypes using HRP-LD5 as conjuate [23,24]. Out of 326 samples tested, only 42 (12.9 ) were positive for anti-Tat antibodies, and most of these (31/42 or 73.8 ) showed only weak reactivity (Fig. 2a, 3a). No anti-Tat positive samples were detected in the blood-donor sample. In contrast, gp41 showed strong antigenicity: all 326 samples reacted withFigure 4. Comparison of Tat-neutralizing potential of plasma samples. (a) Antibody-mediated neutralization of exogenous recombinant fulllength Tat. The percent inhibition of transactivation at 48 h was plotted on the y-axis with the following samples on the x-axis: HIV+Tat+, HIV-1seropositive and anti-Tat-seropositive plasma; HIV+Tat-, HIV-1-seropositive and anti-Tat-seronegative plasma; and HIV-, healthy blood-donor plasma. The data on the y-axis represent the inhibition of the SEAP release in the culture supernatant of HEK293T cells, as described in the “Materials and Methods” section. The boxes.
