L lines, the TRIzolH reagent was used, following the manufacturer’s recommendations. cDNA was obtained from 500 ng of RNA using random hexamer primers and the H-minus RevertAid cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas, Ontario, Canada), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.ETS Fusion Targets in CancerDNA Extraction and Bisulfite TreatmentTo assess whether decreased gene expression was associated with DNA methylation, DNA was extracted from buy Calciferol prostate tissue samples and from cell lines by the phenol-chloroform method [32], and subsequently subjected to sodium bisulfite conversion using the EZ DNA Methylation-GoldTM Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. CpGenomeTM Universal Methylated DNA (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and CpGenomeTM Universal Unmethylated DNA (Millipore) were also bisulfite-modified to serve as positive and negative controls, respectively.reference gene to normalize for DNA input and the qMSP reaction was performed as previously described [33].Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and Quantitative PCR (qPCR)We used VCaP cells 15481974 and the rabbit anti-ERG monoclonal antibody (Epitomics, Burlingame, CA) to detect ERG binding to the promoter of HIST1H4L and KCNN2, as previously described [25]. Briefly, 26106 cells were used for each immunoprecipitation with the EZ-Magna ChIPTM G kit (Millipore), following manufacturer’s instructions [39]. To select for putative ETS binding sequences in the promoter regions, a bioinformatic survey of the 10 kb sequence upstream of the translation start site was conducted using ConSite [40]. Three promoter regions of HIST1H4L (2454, 2728 and 22266), each containing two putative ETS binding sequences, and three promoter regions of KCNN2 (21442, 21833 and 24083), the first two containing one putative ETS binding sequence and the last containing three, were selected for qPCR analysis of the ERG-immunoprecipitated chromatin. Primers were designed using the Primer3 online software and acquired from Metabion. Primers for a negative control region were also included to correct for unspecific binding (Supplementary Table S1) [41]. qPCR was performed using Power SYBRH Green (Applied Biosystems), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. 
Serial dilutions of the input fraction were used to calculate primers’ efficiency. Results are shown as a fold enrichment of ERG bound chromatin relative to IgG and corrected to the negative control region [42].Cell Line Treatment with 5-aza-29deoxycytidine (DAC)To evaluate whether promoter methylation of CAV1, IGFBP3 and ECRG4 was associated with decreased transcript expression in PCa, we treated LNCaP and 22Rv1 prostate cancer cell lines (the first harboring an ETV1 rearrangement and the second without known ETS rearrangements) with 1 mM of the DNA methyltransferases inhibitor 5-aza-29deoxycytidine (DAC; Sigma-Aldrich), as previously described [33]. After 72 hours of treatment, DNA and RNA were extracted as described 12926553 above.Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)In order to determine the relative expression levels of selected genes, qRT-PCR was performed. Primers and probes for the selected genes and the endogenous control (glucoronidase beta, GUSB) were acquired as pre-developed TaqManH Gene Expression Assays from Applied Biosystems (by LifeTechnologies, Foster City, CA) (Supplementary Table S1). GUSB gene was used for normalization of the expression levels of the selected genes. All samples were run in triplicate and multiple negative MedChemExpress Methionine enkephalin controls wer.L lines, the TRIzolH reagent was used, following the manufacturer’s recommendations. cDNA was obtained from 500 ng of RNA using random hexamer primers and the H-minus RevertAid cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas, Ontario, Canada), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.ETS Fusion Targets in CancerDNA Extraction and Bisulfite TreatmentTo assess whether decreased gene expression was associated with DNA methylation, DNA was extracted from prostate tissue samples and from cell lines by the phenol-chloroform method [32], and subsequently subjected to sodium bisulfite conversion using the EZ DNA Methylation-GoldTM Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. CpGenomeTM Universal Methylated DNA (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and CpGenomeTM Universal Unmethylated DNA (Millipore) were also bisulfite-modified to serve as positive and negative controls, respectively.reference gene to normalize for DNA input and the qMSP reaction was performed as previously described [33].Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and Quantitative PCR (qPCR)We used VCaP cells 15481974 and the rabbit anti-ERG monoclonal antibody (Epitomics, Burlingame, CA) to detect ERG binding to the promoter of HIST1H4L and KCNN2, as previously described [25]. Briefly, 26106 cells were used for each immunoprecipitation with the EZ-Magna ChIPTM G kit (Millipore), following manufacturer’s instructions [39]. To select for putative ETS binding sequences in the promoter regions, a bioinformatic survey of the 10 kb sequence upstream of the translation start site was conducted using ConSite [40]. Three promoter regions of HIST1H4L (2454, 2728 and 22266), each containing two putative ETS binding sequences, and three promoter regions of KCNN2 (21442, 21833 and 24083), the first two containing one putative ETS binding sequence and the last containing three, were selected for qPCR analysis of the ERG-immunoprecipitated chromatin. Primers were designed using the Primer3 online software and acquired from Metabion. Primers for a negative control region were also included to correct for unspecific binding (Supplementary Table S1) [41]. qPCR was performed using Power SYBRH Green (Applied Biosystems), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Serial dilutions of the input fraction were used to calculate primers’ efficiency. Results are shown as a fold enrichment of ERG bound chromatin relative to IgG and corrected to the negative control region [42].Cell Line Treatment with 5-aza-29deoxycytidine (DAC)To evaluate whether promoter methylation of CAV1, IGFBP3 and ECRG4 was associated with decreased transcript expression in PCa, we treated LNCaP and 22Rv1 prostate cancer cell lines (the first harboring an ETV1 rearrangement and the second without known ETS rearrangements) with 1 mM of the DNA methyltransferases inhibitor 5-aza-29deoxycytidine (DAC; Sigma-Aldrich), as previously described [33]. After 72 hours of treatment, DNA 
and RNA were extracted as described 12926553 above.Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)In order to determine the relative expression levels of selected genes, qRT-PCR was performed. Primers and probes for the selected genes and the endogenous control (glucoronidase beta, GUSB) were acquired as pre-developed TaqManH Gene Expression Assays from Applied Biosystems (by LifeTechnologies, Foster City, CA) (Supplementary Table S1). GUSB gene was used for normalization of the expression levels of the selected genes. All samples were run in triplicate and multiple negative controls wer.
