Condly, since we speculated that selection plays a key role in determining which strains can or cannot elicit mastitis, we used phylogroup A as a discrete PD173074 msds monophyletic group where pre-existing evidence pointed to the possibility that this group as a whole becomes enriched in mastitis vis-a-vis the external environment10. In this way, we identified lineages within phylogroup A that may be responsible for this enrichment. Thirdly, we were conscious of the fact that broad evolutionary distances (such as those which exist between the distinct phylogroups) may have profound effects on the distribution of genes, as a consequence of shared ancestry rather than functional relatedness. Such evolutionary CEP-37440 chemical information distance may underpin some of the differences observed by others, since previous comparisons often involved few MPEC isolates versus comparator strains of disparate phylogenetic origins21,23,26. We have found that phylogroup A MPEC (MPEC) tend to be more closely related to each other than would be expected if these bacteria had arisen at random within the population structure of phylogroup A, and have provided evidence which suggests that this is unlikely to be due to the fact that only a small number of lineages have had the opportunity to colonise the bovine udder (founder effects). Rather, our data suggests that an active selective process operates in mastitis, which permits the growth of certain strains whilst purifying others from this habitat. Our investigation of the pan-genome of phylogroup A and MPEC suggests that this selection operates at the level of just three key genetic loci that are ubiquitously present in MPEC but only sporadically present in the wider phylogroup A population. It is noteworthy that two of these three loci have metabolic functions whilst the third is of unknown function; an observation which further highlights the importance of anatomical niche nutritional milieu in pathogenicity, as shown functionally in an increasing number of studies with E. coli and related organisms. Notably, a recent population genomic study of Klebsiella pneumoniae also highlighted an association with metabolic loci among bovine mastitis strains although the specific metabolic determinants differed44. The implications of these findings are that these genes and, hence, their products’ functions, may be essential for MPEC, yet dispensable for phylogroup A E. coli inhabiting other niches. Whilst less comprehensive, previous studies have hinted towards the involvement of ferric citrate uptake in mastitis pathogenicity, as well as the possibility that MPEC represent a specific pathotype or ecotype within E. coli, we consider this present work to provideScientific RepoRts | 6:30115 | DOI: 10.1038/srepConclusionswww.nature.com/scientificreports/the first substantive and statistically robust evidence that these bacteria contain of a core set of MPEC-specifying determinants which are actively selected for in the bovine udder, at least within phylogroup A E. coli. Finally, it is important to note that the three genetic loci which we posit are crucial for mastitis in phylogroup A MPEC may not be the same for E. coli from other phylogroups. The products of genes which operate in a bacterium do so within a framework of the products of other genes co-resident in the genome, and these existing frameworks are likely to be more distinct the more distantly two E. coli are related. Characterisation of MPEC in other phylogroups will be carried out separately,.Condly, since we speculated that selection plays a key role in determining which strains can or cannot elicit mastitis, we used phylogroup A as a discrete monophyletic group where pre-existing evidence pointed to the possibility that this group as a whole becomes enriched in mastitis vis-a-vis the external environment10. In this way, we identified lineages within phylogroup A that may be responsible for this enrichment. Thirdly, we were conscious of the fact that broad evolutionary distances (such as those which exist between the distinct phylogroups) may have profound effects on the distribution of genes, as a consequence of shared ancestry rather than functional relatedness. Such evolutionary distance may underpin some of the differences observed by others, since previous comparisons often involved few MPEC isolates versus comparator strains of disparate phylogenetic origins21,23,26. We have found that phylogroup A MPEC (MPEC) tend to be more closely related to each other than would be expected if these bacteria had arisen at random within the population structure of phylogroup A, and have provided evidence which suggests that this is unlikely to be due to the fact that only a small number of lineages have had the opportunity to colonise the bovine udder (founder effects). Rather, our data suggests that an active selective process operates in mastitis, which permits the growth of certain strains whilst purifying others from this habitat. Our investigation of the pan-genome of phylogroup A and MPEC suggests that this selection operates at the level of just three key genetic loci that are ubiquitously present in MPEC but only sporadically present in the wider phylogroup A population. It is noteworthy that two of these three loci have metabolic functions whilst the third is of unknown function; an observation which further highlights the importance of anatomical niche nutritional milieu in pathogenicity, as shown functionally in an increasing number of studies with E. coli and related organisms. Notably, a recent population genomic study of Klebsiella pneumoniae also highlighted an association with metabolic loci among bovine mastitis strains although the specific metabolic determinants differed44. The implications of these findings are that these genes and, hence, their products’ functions, may be essential for MPEC, yet dispensable for phylogroup A E. coli inhabiting other niches. Whilst less comprehensive, previous studies have hinted towards the involvement of ferric citrate uptake in mastitis pathogenicity, as well as the possibility that MPEC represent a specific pathotype or ecotype within E. coli, we consider this present work to provideScientific RepoRts | 6:30115 | DOI: 10.1038/srepConclusionswww.nature.com/scientificreports/the first substantive and statistically robust evidence that these bacteria contain of a core set of MPEC-specifying determinants which are actively selected for in the bovine udder, at least within phylogroup A E. coli. Finally, it is important to note that the three genetic loci which we posit are crucial for mastitis in phylogroup A MPEC may not be the same for E. coli from other phylogroups. The products of genes which operate in a bacterium do so within a framework of the products of other genes co-resident in the genome, and these existing frameworks are likely to be more distinct the more distantly two E. coli are related. Characterisation of MPEC in other phylogroups will be carried out separately,.
