Onses to intergroup interactions. The current research also showed that Latinas
Onses to intergroup interactions. The current investigation also showed that Latinas’ beliefs about Whites’ motives predicted greater threatavoidance following positive feedback from Whites over and above individual variations in interpersonal rejection sensitivity (Experiment ), ethnic stigma consciousness (Experiment 2), and racebased rejection sensitivity (Experiment three). Thus, while higher suspicion of Whites’ motives is modestly related with a lot more adverse intergroup perceptions and greater racebased rejection expectations among minorities (Big et al 203), these research illustrate that suspicion of Whites’ motives for nonprejudiced behavior uniquely relates to responses to good feedback in intergroup interactions. Contributions and Implications on the Current Work This perform extends prior investigation on intergroup relations within a number of important techniques. Whereas a substantial amount of study has examined how Whites’ racial attitudes, beliefs, and motivations for prejudiced (or nonprejudiced) behavior influence interracial interactions, individual variations in ethnic minorities’ beliefs and their implications for interracial interactions happen to be reasonably neglected inside the social PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25295272 psychological literature. The current perform extends prior research by focusing on variations inside minority groups and person by scenario interactions as determinants of cognition, have an effect on, and physiology in intergroup interactions. The current operate also extends prior investigation by focusing on how ethnic minorities respond to good evaluations in intergroup interactions. Findings highlight the limitations of assuming that all members of minority groups respond exactly the same way in intergroup interactions. While various research have examined the implications of Whites’ levels of internal and external motivations to prevent prejudice on their responses in interracial contexts (e.g Kunstman, Plant, Zielaskowski, LaCosse, 203; Plant, Devine, Peruche, 200), untilJ Exp Soc Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 207 January 0.Author Chloro-IB-MECA Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptMajor et al.Pagenow research has not examined the implications of minorities’ perceptions of Whites’ internal and external motivations for interracial interactions. These are the very first experiments to examine the association amongst minorities’ suspicions about Whites’ motives and their reactions to constructive feedback directed toward themselves in intergroup interactions. Since the behavior of your interaction partner was held continuous within the current studies, our findings illustrate the significance of chronic perceptions of others’ motivations to respond devoid of prejudice. Benefits recommend two intriguing but as but untested possibilities. First, perceptions of motives could be just as essential as actual motives in shaping intergroup interactions. Second, suspicion of Whites’ motives for giving optimistic feedback may well explain why minorities’ perceptions of Whites’ friendliness are inclined to rely additional heavily on nonverbal than verbal cues (Dovidio et al 2002). The latter may perhaps be perceived as extra controllable, and therefore as extra disingenuous. The present study illustrates that chronically perceiving Whites’ constructive responses toward ethnic minorities as disingenuous as motivated primarily by external concerns with appearing unprejudiced is connected to increased feelings of pressure, uncertainty, and threat avoidance among minorities once they receive optimistic evaluation.
