Share this post on:

Itioso UniversitParis DescartesAbstractThe present study examines how target group’s stereotype
Itioso UniversitParis DescartesAbstractThe present study examines how target group’s stereotype content (on warmth and competence dimensions) influences subsequent target evaluation following selfthreat associated with one’s competence. Participants 1st received threatening or nonthreatening feedback on their competence. They evaluated then a job candidate who was stereotyped either as competent and cold (Asian) or as warm and incompetent (functioning mother). As predicted, threatened participants derogated only the Asian target on her perceived warmth and her suitability for any job, but didn’t derogate the operating mother. In addition, perceived warmth mediated the observed variations in the evaluation on the targets’ job suitability. These final results extend investigation on selfthreat and prejudice by which includes Stereotype Content material Model within this link.Search phrases Selfthreat; Motivation; Stereotyping; Stereotypecontent People’s motivation to preserve a positive selfimage has been shown to cause damaging evaluations of stereotyped targets. Although men and women differ in their chronic motivation to keep a constructive selfimage, specific events that threaten one’s constructive selfimage can activate this motivation. Selfthreat decreases selfesteem (Baumeister Tice, 985) and consequently, persons Cecropin B chemical information engage in techniques to restore their selfesteem and optimistic selfimage. Fein and Spencer (997) showed that one of these techniques includes derogating members of stereotyped group. Which is, selfthreat increases negative evaluation of stereotyped targets. These authors very first gave participants false adverse (i.e. selfthreatening) or positive feedback on an alleged I.Q. test. Participants then evaluated a job candidate who was either Jewish (i.e JAP: “Jewish American Princess”) or Italian. Benefits showed that following selfthreat, participants evaluated the Jewish candidate additional negatively than the Italian candidate. This impact was not found following constructive feedback. Although both of these targets are members of stereotyped outgroups, only the Jewish target was derogated. We suggest that not all (stereotyped) targets are suitable to satisfy one’s motivation to restore a optimistic selfimage following a threat. As outlined by Fein and Spencer, only negatively stereotyped targets (e.g JAP, homosexuals) are probably to be derogated following selfthreat. As these authors argued, the JAP stereotype is globally speaking a lot more damaging than the Italian stereotype. As a result, damaging stereotypes might justify the unfavorable evaluation of targets (Kunda Spencer, 2003). However, as proposed by the Stereotype Content Model (SCM, Fiske, Cuddy, Glick Xu, 2002; Fiske, Xu, Cuddy Glick, 999), a lot of outgroups will be the objects of damaging stereotyping, but not for the same reason. The current work aims to refine the selfthreat stereotype link by like the target stereotype content material. This PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25361489 investigation will also refine the SCM by displaying that distinct sorts of selfthreat motivate differential usage of your stereotype content dimensions.NIHPA Author Manuscript NIHPA Author Manuscript NIHPA Author ManuscriptStereotype Content ModelFiske et al.’s (2002) operate revealed that stereotype content varies along two most important dimensions: Competence and warmth. Perceived levels of competence and warmth indicate to what extent a group is respected and liked, respectively. Two major kinds of mixed stereotypes can thus be derived: Paternalistic stereotypes involve groups perceived as warm but not competent (e.g housewiv.

Share this post on:

Author: Gardos- Channel

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.