Share this post on:

Aluru if interaction with web page is included: b = 0.049, n.s.; interaction Internet site 9 Education, b = -0.184, P \ 0.001). Endorsement of coercive policies was Aglafoline positively related with the belief that individuals who became infected by way of sex or drugs got what they deserved (b = 0.136, P\ 0.001), getting adverse feelings toward PLHA (b = 0.116, P \ 0.001), a larger level of symbolic stigma (b = 0.098, P \ 0.01), worrying about getting infected (b = 0.073, P \ 0.05), and obtaining misconceptions about casual transmission of HIV (b = 0.192, P \ 0.001), the effect of which was stronger in Mumbai than in Bengaluru (interaction b = 0.089, P \ 0.05). Right transmission information was positively associated with endorsement of coercive policies in Bengaluru (b = 0.090, P \ 0.05), but negatively in Mumbai (interaction b = -0.265, P \ 0.05).Intent to discriminate against PLHA was significantly reduce in Mumbai than in Bengaluru (b = -0.101, P \ 0.01), nevertheless it was related together with the identical components at both web-sites, as indicated by the lack of important interactions involving website and also other predictors. As with endorsement of coercive policies, respondents expressed a considerably greater intent to discriminate the higher their blame score (b = 0.067, P \ 0.01), their unfavorable their feelings toward PLHA (b = 0.177, P \ 0.001), their symbolic stigma (b = 0.060, P \ 0.05), their worries about HIV infection (b = 0.241, P \ 0.001), and their number of misconceptions (b = 0.445, P \ 0.001). But those with larger knowledge of correct transmission routes showed less intent to discriminate against PLHA (b = -0.074, P \ 0.01).Discussion This study represents the very first significant scale try to quantify distinct dimensions PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21269259 of individual manifestations of AIDSrelated stigma in urban India. The results reveal a high prevalence of stigma attitudes and intent to discriminate in each cities, suggesting that AIDS stigma is just not a regionspecific phenomenon in India. The vast majority of participants appeared to blame PLHA for their condition, with more than 80 stating that HIV-infected individuals “gotAIDS Behav (2012) 16:70010 Table 4 Things associated with stigma and discrimination in many linear regression Endorsement of coercive policiesa (n = 1025) B Web page (0 = Bengaluru, 1 = Mumbai) Gender (0 = Male, 1 = Female) Education (0 = 10 years or much less, 1 = [10 years) Know PLHA (0 = No one, 1 = Know C1) Blame (PLHA got what they deserved) Adverse Feelings toward PLHA Symbolic stigma Worry about HIV infection Transmission misconceptions index HIV know-how( correct) Web page 9 Education Web site 9 Misconceptions Web page 9 HIV information RaIntent to discriminate against PLHAb (n = 1036) B SE B 0.139 0.118 0.123 0.127 0.043 0.002 0.061 0.059 0.035 0.003 0.362 b -0.101 0.005 0.014 -0.030 0.067 0.177 0.060 0.241 0.445 -0.074 SE B 1.289 0.371 0.086 0.127 0.093 0.031 0.001 0.045 0.043 0.030 0.003 0.176 0.054 0.005 0.b 0.448 -0.068 0.049 0.017 0.136 0.116 0.098 0.073 0.192 0.090 -0.184 0.089 -0.265-0.457 0.020 0.065 -0.153 0.111 0.011 0.134 0.497 0.571 -0.009 -0.196 0.140 0.054 0.143 0.005 0.140 0.095 0.156 0.007 -0.592 0.125 -0.B unstandardized regression coefficient, SE B normal error of regression coefficient, b standardized regression coefficient Model for endorsement of coercive policies includes important interactions only (DR2 = 0.022, P \ 0.001). b Model for intent to discriminate excludes interactions (DR2 for all interactions in between predictors and site: 0.009, n.s.) P \ 0.05, P \ 0.0.

Share this post on:

Author: Gardos- Channel

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.