L ethics. Two intense views clash those represented by supporters of “code ethics” and those represented by the adherents of “no-code ethics” . Opponents from the codification of ethics  typically formulate three accusation claims: deontologism, conventionalism and opportunism. The first one particular is based around the statement that globe on the values and duties won’t ever be transformed into neat manual with the moral conduct. The code of ethics reduces the issue in the duty for the obedience to norms. Evaluation criterion is established as performing one’s duties, as opposed to personal reflection or examination of one’s conscience. The second claim comes out in the statement that the morality is one thing independent of your M1 receptor modulator convention and contract, and professional ethics is inseparably connected with it. Producing a code causes the problem ofeJIFCC2014Vol25No2pp199-Elbieta Puacz, Waldemar Glusiec, Barbara Madej-Czerwonka Polish Code of Ethics of a Healthcare Laboratory Specialistestablishing standards in expert ethics: who and by what criteria is supposed to appoint these norms A sign of opportunistic character ascribed to supporters of codes is expediential dimension of these documents. Elaborating codes typically serves a certain occupational group instead of develops a broad and impartial moral reflection. Within a response to accusations of supporters of “no-code ethics” opposite arguments are place forward. Firstly, they underline that obedience to the code is in no way discharging a person from moral responsibility. Secondly, the norm incorporated in the code, irrespective from the convention in which it was developed, is on top of that sensitizing the employee to the moral dimension of action to which this norm refers to. Thirdly, codes of ethics extremely usually appeal to anti-pragmatic category of dignity. It’s tough to accuse these documents of exclusively economic character and to assign to them only praxeological function. It truly is probable also to dismiss the accusation from the opportunism by filling the elementary requirement put ahead of each and every code of ethics, i.e. defending the social welfare. Correct concern regarding the society as a complete protects in the scenario in which the organization of a given occupational group will grow to be the only grounds for producing the code . Within the light of this discussion it can be doable to express two considerable conclusions. It is difficult to envision experienced ethics with no clearly defined principles and duties and these are most often expressed within the type of norms of your code. This does not imply even though that the whole area of qualified ethics is reduced and is contained in these documents. Art. 27 of CEMLS accurately emphasizes it: “this Code of Ethics of a Medical Laboratory Specialist could be the collection of fundamental ethical requirements that needs to be followed by each and every representative of the profession” . Secondly, codes need to not develop into a “legalization of ethics”. Contrarily, the point is Pagethat norms integrated in codes are rooted inside the worth systems in the neighborhood. This rooting of CEMLS is explained in the preamble: ,,The Code of Ethics of the Medical Laboratory Specialist is grounded in usually PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345631 accepted ethical requirements at the same time as the principles originating from the expert tradition” . Concern about “legalization of ethics” in CEMLS is dispelled by Art. 28-29: ,,This Code of Ethics of a Health-related Laboratory Specialist would be the source of moral guidelines and will not replace the procedure of a.