Share this post on:

Along with the hangers around the south side ofside in the model bridge were preset as the broken hanger separately. The degree south the model bridge have been preset as the damaged hanger separately. The degree of harm was set set12.5 , 25 , 37.5 andand 50 , respectively. EDC17 DC24 belongs to of harm was to to 12.5 , 25 , 37.five 50 , respectively. EDC17 DC24 belongs to the second category, in which PHA-543613 Purity Damage occurred in two hangers simultaneously. The The dethe second category, in which damage occurred in two hangers simultaneously. degree of damage was also set toset to 12.five , 25 , 37.five , 50 ,50 , respectively. Table five all of the gree of harm was also 12.five , 25 , 37.5 , and and respectively. Table 5 lists lists all damage conditions investigated within the test model. the harm circumstances investigated within the test model.Table 5. Betamethasone disodium Cancer Twenty-four damage circumstances thought of by the test model. Table 5. Twenty-four damage conditions thought of by the test model.Damage Case No. Harm Case No. EDC 1 EDC 1 EDC five Single hanger failure Single hanger EDC 5 EDC 92 EDC 136 failure EDC 92 EDC 170 Double hanger failure EDC 136 EDC 214 Double hanger EDC 170 failure EDC 214 4.three. Damage Identification Final results Damage Variety Harm Sort Harm Hanger No. Damage Hanger No. S2 S2 S3 S3 S4 S5 S4 S4 S5 S5 S4 S6 S4 S5 S4 S6 Damage Degree Damage Degree 12.5 25 37.five 50 12.5 25 37.5 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.5 25 37.5 50 12.5 25 37.five 50 12.5 25 37.5 50 12.five 25 37.five 50 12.5 25 37.5 50 12.five 25 37.five 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.5 25 37.5 50Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW12 of 17 The model cable force was adjusted to about 350 N, and the south hanger cable force 4.three. Damage Identification Outcomes is shown in Figure 11. The cable force is uniform, and this state might be regarded as the The model cable bridge. completed state of the force was adjusted to about 350 N, and also the south hanger cable force is shown in Figure 11. The cable force is uniform, and this state may be regarded as the completed state of the bridge.cable force350Cable force250 200 150 one hundred 50SSSSSSSSSHanger numberFigure Cable force of of south hangers. Figure 11.11. Cable force south hangers.The complete harm (the cable force is lowered by 100 ) each hanger on on south The full damage (the cable force is reduced by 100 ) ofof each and every hanger the the sideside was simulatedremoving the damaged hanger itself. The The difference of dewas simulated by by removing the damaged hanger itself. difference of deflection south in the anchorage point of hanger and tie-beam beneath healthier state state and different flection in the anchorage point of hanger and tie-beam below healthyand many damage circumstances was was obtained, and also the results are plotted in Figure 12. Then, the dedamage conditionsobtained, and the outcomes are plotted in Figure 12. Then, the deflection difference influence matrix of your model bridge within this state state was also obtained. flection distinction influence matrix of your model bridge in thiswas also obtained.0 lection adjust anchorage point -1 -2 -S1 S2 S3 SAppl. Sci. 2021, 11,The complete damage (the cable force is decreased by one hundred ) of every single hanger around the south side was simulated by removing the damaged hanger itself. The difference of deflection in the anchorage point of hanger and tie-beam beneath healthful state and several damage conditions was obtained, and the final results are plotted in Figure 12. Then, the de12 of 16 flection distinction influence.

Share this post on:

Author: Gardos- Channel