L ethics. Two extreme views clash these represented by supporters of “code ethics” and those represented by the adherents of “no-code ethics” . Opponents of the codification of ethics  usually formulate 3 accusation claims: deontologism, conventionalism and opportunism. The very first one particular is primarily based on the statement that planet of your values and duties will not ever be transformed into neat manual on the moral conduct. The code of ethics reduces the problem in the duty to the obedience to norms. Evaluation criterion is established as performing one’s duties, in lieu of personal reflection or examination of one’s conscience. The second claim comes out in the statement that the morality is some thing independent on the convention and contract, and experienced ethics is inseparably connected with it. Generating a code causes the issue ofeJIFCC2014Vol25No2pp199-Elbieta Puacz, Waldemar Glusiec, Barbara Madej-Czerwonka Polish Code of Ethics of a Healthcare Laboratory Specialistestablishing requirements in qualified ethics: who and by what criteria is supposed to appoint these norms A sign of opportunistic character ascribed to supporters of codes is expediential dimension of those documents. Elaborating codes ordinarily serves a specific occupational group instead of develops a broad and impartial moral reflection. In a response to accusations of supporters of “no-code ethics” opposite arguments are put forward. Firstly, they underline that obedience for the code is never ever discharging an individual from moral responsibility. Secondly, the norm included inside the code, irrespective in the convention in which it was made, is in addition sensitizing the employee for the moral dimension of action to which this norm refers to. Thirdly, codes of ethics very usually appeal to anti-pragmatic category of dignity. It truly is difficult to accuse these documents of exclusively financial character and to assign to them only praxeological function. It is actually probable also to dismiss the accusation of your opportunism by filling the elementary requirement place just before each and every code of ethics, i.e. defending the social welfare. True concern in regards to the society as a entire protects in the predicament in which the business enterprise of a provided occupational group will turn out to be the only grounds for developing the code . Within the light of this discussion it is probable to express two important conclusions. It’s tough to consider Gelseminic acid professional ethics with out clearly defined principles and duties and these are most normally expressed inside the type of norms of your code. This doesn’t imply even though that the whole location of specialist ethics is lowered and is contained in these documents. Art. 27 of CEMLS accurately emphasizes it: “this Code of Ethics of a Medical Laboratory Specialist is definitely the collection of basic ethical requirements that should be followed by each representative on the profession” . Secondly, codes should really not grow to be a “legalization of ethics”. Contrarily, the point is Pagethat norms integrated in codes are rooted within the worth systems with the community. This rooting of CEMLS is explained within the preamble: ,,The Code of Ethics in the Healthcare Laboratory Specialist is grounded in commonly PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345631 accepted ethical requirements also because the principles originating in the skilled tradition” . Concern about “legalization of ethics” in CEMLS is dispelled by Art. 28-29: ,,This Code of Ethics of a Health-related Laboratory Specialist would be the source of moral guidelines and does not replace the process of a.