L ethics. Two intense views clash these represented by C-DIM12 site supporters of “code ethics” and those represented by the adherents of “no-code ethics” . Opponents in the codification of ethics  commonly formulate 3 accusation claims: deontologism, conventionalism and opportunism. The very first 1 is primarily based around the statement that world of the values and duties will not ever be transformed into neat manual on the moral conduct. The code of ethics reduces the issue with the duty for the obedience to norms. Evaluation criterion is established as doing one’s duties, as an alternative to private reflection or examination of one’s conscience. The second claim comes out from the statement that the morality is one thing independent of your convention and contract, and professional ethics is inseparably connected with it. Producing a code causes the issue ofeJIFCC2014Vol25No2pp199-Elbieta Puacz, Waldemar Glusiec, Barbara Madej-Czerwonka Polish Code of Ethics of a Medical Laboratory Specialistestablishing requirements in skilled ethics: who and by what criteria is supposed to appoint these norms A sign of opportunistic character ascribed to supporters of codes is expediential dimension of these documents. Elaborating codes ordinarily serves a distinct occupational group as an alternative to develops a broad and impartial moral reflection. Inside a response to accusations of supporters of “no-code ethics” opposite arguments are place forward. Firstly, they underline that obedience for the code is by no means discharging a person from moral responsibility. Secondly, the norm included in the code, irrespective in the convention in which it was designed, is also sensitizing the employee to the moral dimension of action to which this norm refers to. Thirdly, codes of ethics extremely usually appeal to anti-pragmatic category of dignity. It is actually difficult to accuse these documents of exclusively economic character and to assign to them only praxeological function. It really is probable also to dismiss the accusation of the opportunism by filling the elementary requirement put just before each and every code of ethics, i.e. protecting the social welfare. Correct concern in regards to the society as a complete protects from the circumstance in which the organization of a provided occupational group will turn out to be the only grounds for developing the code . Within the light of this discussion it is actually probable to express two important conclusions. It can be hard to visualize skilled ethics without clearly defined principles and duties and those are most generally expressed in the form of norms of your code. This does not mean even though that the complete location of skilled ethics is reduced and is contained in these documents. Art. 27 of CEMLS accurately emphasizes it: “this Code of Ethics of a Healthcare Laboratory Specialist could be the collection of basic ethical requirements that need to be followed by each and every representative with the profession” . Secondly, codes ought to not become a “legalization of ethics”. Contrarily, the point is Pagethat norms incorporated in codes are rooted inside the value systems of the neighborhood. This rooting of CEMLS is explained inside the preamble: ,,The Code of Ethics in the Healthcare Laboratory Specialist is grounded in normally PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345631 accepted ethical requirements at the same time as the principles originating from the specialist tradition” . Concern about “legalization of ethics” in CEMLS is dispelled by Art. 28-29: ,,This Code of Ethics of a Health-related Laboratory Specialist is definitely the supply of moral recommendations and doesn’t replace the process of a.